|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2879 |
|
| | 258 |
|
| | 1756 |
|
| | 500 |
|
| | 295 |
|
| | 2 |
|
| | 77 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From: Mr. Unregistered*
, 254 months, post #1 |
I don't suppose you could put it in something besides Windows
Media, for those thousands of us who don't have PCs?
|
|
From: Lady Sekhmet*
, 254 months, post #2 |
Perhaps you are unaware that the Windows Media player is available
for the Mac:
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/otherproducts/otherproducts.aspx?pid=windowsmedia
Now the thousands of Mac users can join the millions of PC users :)
|
|
From: Terran*
, 254 months, post #3 |
but....not saying that I have it, do they put it in for LINUX?
|
|
From: Stan*
, 254 months, post #4 |
Perhaps you are unaware that the Windows Media player is available
for the Mac:
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/otherproducts/otherproducts.aspx?pid=windowsmedia
Now the thousands of Mac users can join the millions of PC users :)
Mac users are aware of this and do use it when nescessary, but
frankly, who wants to taint a perfectly good computer with a piece
of buggy virus ridden bloatware that is a micorshaft product?
|
|
From: Chris*
, 254 months, post #5 |
Am I missing something, or can anyone else not get the clip to
play? WinXP
|
|
From: Dave*
, 254 months, post #6 |
It won't play for meweither, I run win XP
|
|
From: Cobe*
, 254 months, post #7 |
I've got Windows 2000 and it plays fine.
|
|
From: Swiftner*
, 254 months, post #8 |
The clip uses windows media 9, if you get sound but no video you do
not have the newest codec. For those with windows, the codec to
play it can be had by just doing windows updates or going to
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/9series/player.aspx
for mac users
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/software/Macintosh/osx/default.aspx
Due to space and network speed I will be using wmv 9 and real codec
10 (which uses real player which can be downloaded for any system
including Linux, etc. and at the moment has best quality vs size)
for my videos. I'm only going to use the newest codecs since they
have best compresion ie smallest size and highest quality. Also if
you don't have your browser set to play vids on left click, right
click the link and choose save target as to download. My main page
will have more info but will not be up till next weekend due to
time constraints. Hope this info helps.
Swifter
|
|
From: im sorry*
, 254 months, post #9 |
mine wont work
|
|
From: femur*
, 254 months, post #10 |
good luck with your site. as someone who uses an older Mac (which
runs OS9, which only has Windows Media Player 7 available for it),
i won't be able to see a thing, but i'll check out your site after
i get a new computer (hopefully later this year).
|
|
From: JM*
, 254 months, post #11 |
Got the new codec, still won't work
|
|
From: Lady Sekhmet*
, 254 months, post #12 |
Ok, just for the record - I run several Linux (Fedora Core 2) boxes
here, I also have a Mac running panther that I'm very fond of. But
the bulk of my systems are running the "buggy virus ridden
bloatware" Microsoft products which frankly havent been buggy or
virus ridden since Windows XP Pro. The only people with slow, virus
ridden systems are the ones who don't take two seconds to turn on
their firewall and don't have the good sense to install antivirus
software and anti adware packages.
That being said, my Mac is running lots of software that didn't
come directly from Apple and it seems to be quite happy with it. I
can't say I like having WM9 on my Mac, but I do, and it works. It
ONLY plays windows media files.
The alternative is for everyone to encode their video in Quicktime,
which is equally annoying to install on Windows machines. Since
there are more windows boxes than Macs it stands to reason that
Windows Media is the format of choice. Its the reason I host all of
the clips I've posted here in that format. Some people can't see
them, but most can.
You can't please everyone... People running DOS, Linux, or Macs
prior to OS X are just out of luck. Frankly I can't imagine why
anyone would run OS9 when OS X offers OS9 emulation. The Linux
thing bugs me... but some enterprising young buck will find a
solution.
|
|
From: anonymous*
, 254 months, post #13 |
wot the hell yall talkin about??????????????????
|
|
From: anonymous*
, 254 months, post #14 |
IT skips all the time and I got Windows series 9
|
|
From: uri*
, 253 months, post #15 |
>You can't please everyone... People running DOS, Linux, or Macs
prior to OS X are just out
> of luck. Frankly I can't imagine why anyone would run OS9 when
OS X offers OS9
>emulation.
because some of us are running "legacy" Macs onto which OS X cannot
be installed? because here are some applications which will not run
in Classic Mode?
do you really find that wmv3 gives better quality/byte than Divx or
mpegX encoding?
installing WMP on a Mac is a weirdly time consuming procedure --
all kinds of stuff gets installed that may, or may not, have
anything to do with playing .wmv files.
neither of these will help OS 9 users, but:
it doesn't yet support wmv3 (MediaPlayer 9) but VLC (formerly known
as videolan client) -- free download from http://www.videolan.org
-- will play pretty much anything -- including wmv1 and wmv2 files.
mplayer for linux is supposed to support wmv1, wmv2, and wmv3
playback. don't know if this support exists in the OS X version.
the documentation at sourceforge is no help, but you could download
mplayer (again, its free) and give it a try.
http://mplayerosx.sourceforge.net/
|
|
From: Lady Sekhmet*
, 253 months, post #16 |
>Do you really find that wmv3 gives better quality/byte than
Divx or mpegX encoding?
You bet! Lets remember that most clips linked here have a target
audience of computer playback. They aren't interested in getting a
720x480 30fps rendering, they just want a clean viewable clip in
the shortest download time. I've found that WM9 encoded video
absolutely beats mpeg4 codecs at this. Very small file size, and
excellent video quality. And lets remember, the vast majority of
people don't even know what Divx and Xvid are, let alone VLC. You
can't ask the average computer user to identify, download, and
install exotic codecs when a simpler path is available.
Throw in the fact that WM9 has a HUGE installed base doesn't hurt
either. Now that mplayer on Linux supports it, the only platform
not able to play WM9 are those running Mac OS9 and earlier which is
frankly a very tiny group. You may as well ask folks to support the
Amiga.
>>installing WMP on a Mac is a weirdly time consuming
procedure -- all kinds of stuff gets installed that may, or may
not, have anything to do with playing .wmv files.
My experience installing WM9 on Panther was quite the opposite. It
was a very quick and clean install. It didn't try to hijack any
playback types other than AVI and WM. Are you sure you're
installing the latest version directly from Microsofts website?
Anywho, while I sympathize with your position, I think its
unreasonable to get angry over a contributors decision on a codec.
I think WM9 yeilds the best quality to the largest group of people.
There are other codecs to be sure, but why should we be forced to
encode to the lowest possible denominator just so the last 1% of
viewers is included?
|
|
From: Lady Sekhmet*
, 253 months, post #17 |
And fwiw, my short list of "impossible to view without Windows
Media 9" videos can be found here:
http://members.aol.com/sekhmetpriestess/vids.htm
:)
|
|
From: uri*
, 253 months, post #18 |
"And lets remember, the vast majority of people don't even know
what Divx and Xvid are, let alone VLC. You can't ask the average
computer user to identify, download, and install exotic codecs when
a simpler path is available."
downloading and installing VLC is no more complicated than
installing WMP.
as for divx being "exotic"? i don't know much about installing
codecs on Windows machines, but on a Mac it involves
double-clicking on the installer, then (sometimes) answering some
questions about licensing.
http://www.divx.com/divx/
"My experience installing WM9 on Panther was quite the opposite. It
was a very quick and clean install. It didn't try to hijack any
playback types other than AVI and WM. Are you sure you're
installing the latest version directly from Microsofts website?"
yes, from the M$ site. on my 800DP, running 10.3.4, the install
took several minutes, and i got several more minutes of the
spinning beachball before it would run.
you are, of course, entitled to your opinion, but i am not
impressed with the quality of wmv3 files. furthermore, running WMP9
on OS X, i get skips and blocky video or audio-only about half the
time.
"I think its unreasonable to get angry over a contributors decision
on a codec. I think WM9 yeilds the best quality to the largest
group of people. There are other codecs to be sure, but why should
we be forced to encode to the lowest possible denominator just so
the last 1% of viewers is included?"
well, i am not angry, but your decision proceeds from the
assumption that the number of OS 9 users (or M$-resistant OS X
users) in the TG/TF community is a reflection of the number of such
users in the general population. i would submit, that based on the
available data (this thread), it is either 7% or 13% -- depending
on whether Mr. Unregistered was a mac user who was able to follow
your advice. additionally, you have 4 (presumably) unique responses
(~27%) from Windows users indicating that WMP9 does not work for
them.
furthermore, if i cared enough to argue, i would suggest that
"encod[ing for the lowest [common denominator" would be an
appropriate strategy for a vanity site, serving a small community.
the web is all about narrowcasting, so even if your assumptions
about the prevalence of WMP9 capable machines in the TG/TF
community are accurate, the indisputable fact is that "last 1%" of
viewers" is still part of your audience. an audience which you
share with sites like the (moribund) gynomorph.com, and any number
of mIRC and bittorent swappers -- where divx encoded .avi files
have a certain currency.
but, if you want to lead the revolution for the proprietary M$ wmv3
codec, for which there is currently only one working player
(reading the mplayer forums, it appears that the implementation for
Linux still has audio-only issues with wmv3) ... well, more power
to you. ^-^
the smiley is inserted to indicate that i am not trying to piss you
off.
|
|
From: anonymous*
, 253 months, post #19 |
arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr why did you spend your time doing this
|
|
From: Lady Sekhmet*
, 253 months, post #20 |
Well, here's something else to consider - lets say I encode in
Divx. The user gets to my site, can't view the video. Right away
they are inclined to simply walk away. But lets say they decide
they really want to see the video. Naturally, I'd put a link on my
site to point the way to the Divx site.
Now, the poor guy who just wants to see a video clip is faced with
the choice of paying cash for the Divx codec or getting strapped
with spyware and adware thats attached to the free version. Thats
the LAST thing I want to do to visitors. There's too much of that
going around as it is.
So whats the next choice? RealVideo? Thats even worse when it comes
to spyware and adware. So how about VideoLan? First off, VLC is
still in beta, and I shy against recommending beta software to end
users. Second, VLC is essentially a player, you still have to
install the codecs for the stream you want to support. That takes
us back to the Divx spyware issue.
In my opinion, there are only two "safe" choices for streaming
video today. Quicktime 6.5, and Windows Media 9. For those willing
to do so, encoding video clips in BOTH formats will solve this
whole problem. But thats also double the work.
For someone like myself who isn't dedicated to making a great site
(like Paul has here), rendering in both formats is just a nussance.
But I'll tell ya what - if I get as many as say 8 requests for
clips to be in both formats, then I'll see what I can do about
offering them that way. Let the common folks speak ! :) (a dollar
says they aren't even reading this thread)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a New Message to This Thread
Posting Guidelines
Primary
- ANY POST(s) MAY BE REMOVED at the discretion of moderators
for violation of this website's guidelines/rules or any law
applicable to this website.
- All discussions must be transformation related OR of interest to
the transformation community.
- Please try to keep posts appropriate for younger teenage eyes to
view (Things you'd be comfortable sharing with a 13 year-old).
- Do not 'attack' other posters. You may attack an individual's
comments but not the individual.
- Be polite, courteous, and respectful. Please keep the conversations
civil.
- While use of an online alias is ok. Do NOT pretend to be another
(or registered) user.
Intellectual Property
- Do not post direct links to complete copyrighted works. Links
provided by (or approved by) the copyright holder may
be exempt.
- Links to content hosted on websites that have a clear, and easy to
find, process for dealing with infringement(s); and a known
reputation for following through with said process, may
be allowed.
- Please read this site's views on copyrighted content on the FAQ
page.
- Do not plagiarize. Credit your sources.
Helpful
- For posts and material that are not safe for viewing in a workplace
or with younger eyes, please mark the thread or post as either, "MATURE CONTENT", "ADULT CONTENT",
or "NSFW".
- Please post clear SPOILER warnings if you intend to give away
details that would spoil the story for those who have not yet seen
the material, preferably by using the spoiler
tags (don't forget to close the spoiler text with the end tag),
like so: <spoiler>Text to be "hidden"
</spoiler>
-- For additional help, please see: HOW TO: Use Spoiler tags
message thread.
- When starting a New Message Thread, please include details about
your topic of discussion or request in the Subject
field to help draw in readers who are interested and avoid wasting
the time of those who are not. Also helpful in searching for the
topic/thread later.
- If you post a link, please provide some detail as to what it is.
Identify the material if possible.
- Please post in English, or include an English translation, when
possible.
- If seeking material / information, include the results of your own
efforts so that others can offer better help (and avoid wasting
time and effort on redundant searches).
- When starting a new thread to request material or information,
please begin the subject with "REQ:"
or "REQUEST".
Etiquette
- Do not post messages in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
- Do not attack a user for improper spelling and/or grammar. Not all
of our community uses English as their native language.
- Please do not stray (far) from the topic of the original post.
- If a poster provides their contact information for any reason, do
NOT clutter the Message Board by asking them to contact you. They
gave out their contact information for a reason.
- No begging. Ask nicely.
- Do not feed the trolls and spammers. Please ignore them.
- Do not keep asking for clips after others have already posted
information on where to obtain the material.
- Please have some patience. Not everyone visits the board daily.
Your post may not be seen (by someone with the correct information
or idea) for several days or weeks.
- No bumping. Bumping will be treated as intentional spamming.
Advertising
- Do not post advertisements.
- One exception is for products or services that relate to entries on
this site. And even then, only post an announcement once. You
should add links or content to the appropriate database entries. Do
not repeat this information to the message board. Doing so will be
considered spamming.
Miscellaneous
- This list is neither all-inclusive or all-exclusive in nature, and
is meant to guide everyone on appropriate content for and conduct
on this Message Board.
- The purpose of this Message Board is to share information about
transformation-related content, news, ideas, etc. Also acceptable,
are conversations that are of interest to the transformation
community.
- Moderation of posts for reasons not listed above are at the
discretion of the Trusted Users who moderate this website, for the
purpose of keeping things within the "spirit" of the owner's wishes
and the website's purpose.
- If you disagree with a moderation decision, please make an argument
as to why it should be reinstated. Use the posting guidelines to justify your point.
Do not attack the moderator.
[Edit this Page] | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|