|
|
|
|
Jack Chalker book Midnight at the Well of Souls
Gender | |
Most of the characters are transformed into different species. A male villain is turned into a female giant cockroach, another male is turned into a mermaid, and a girl is turned into a man.
|
| |
|
|
From: Ian
, 673 months, post #1 |
I had the privelege of reading this one when it first came out.
It's one of Chalker's earlier books and it dates back to when his
ideas and plot devices were actually new and fresh. It even has
less of the ridiculous politically correct sociological preaching
that make his later books so juvenile and tiresome. Midnight at the
Well of Souls' real value may come from the fact that, unlike
subsequent writings, the whole story is contained in just one,
relatively fast paced, book, instead of volume after volume
dragging forever.
If you're going to read any of Chalker's writings, this is the one
to pick up. You might want to stop with this one too.
|
From: Caitlin B
, 673 months, post #2 |
Chalker's definitive work exploring the limits of biology on free
will challenges the western conciet that the Mind can be held above
and seperate from the body. The cross-species transformations are
handled better than the gender changes.
|
From: Gavin
, 673 months, post #3 |
One of his better ones (and one of his first)
|
From: Fish
, 673 months, post #4 |
This isn't a bad book-- or at least it wasn't when I read it. The
trouble is, I can barely remember enough about it to tell it apart
from his others. This, like most of the Well World
books, is about a confusing array of creatively bizarre life
forms, the Big Computer That Controls Everything, and a mysterious
hero named Nathan Brazil. More about this book I cannot say without
re-reading it.
|
From: guest (Gamemaker1)
, 233 months, post #5 |
Its actually pretty good. Like Exiles the main character has their
own transformation, albeit unwilling. Only this time its all the
way. Stag, in fact. Later on, all of his companions are turned into
does. Definetly a good book.
|
From: Guyote
, 154 months, post #6 |
519 months ago? Wow, this site is older than computers.
Just started reading this book. It is an absolute hoot, simply the
fact that Chalker comes across as a total hack of a writer. He's
clearly shooting for Larry Niven and missing in such spectacular
fashion that it is amazing to read.
Also found it fascinating to see primordial TF/TG fiction, and an
author who was clearly a TF fan/fetishist long before (I presume)
such a thing even existed.
Much more gripping than Downtiming the Night Side.
|
From: Chalkerfan
, 154 months, post #7 |
519 months ago? Wow, this site is older than computers.
Just started reading this book. It is an absolute hoot, simply the
fact that Chalker comes across as a total hack of a writer. He's
clearly shooting for Larry Niven and missing in such spectacular
fashion that it is amazing to read.
Also found it fascinating to see primordial TF/TG fiction, and an
author who was clearly a TF fan/fetishist long before (I presume)
such a thing even existed.
Much more gripping than Downtiming the Night Side.
?
How old are you?
Remember child.
Chalker was around when the whole TG-fiction scene did not exist.
He pre-dates every TG site on the Web and influences every
TG-author in the sci-fi/fantasy category.
Chalker a hack?
You know nothing.
Alcohol-fuelled post?
I'd suggest going with that.
It's a very, very, very poor excuse but the only one you've got.
|
From: guest (Athelstene)
, 154 months, post #8 |
I was an early Chalker fan, but I would say that he diminished as a
creative artist as he went along. I give Jack credit for providing
at least a little TG back in the days when it was hardly to be
found anywhere else. I enthusiastically read most of his books up
to "The Rings of the Masters" series, for a while overlooking the
bad plotting and development habits that seemed to be growing. His
problems were up front in Rings. He had partially hashed good ideas
before, but this time he did it so badly that the series was
utterly hopeless. I never again looked at him with the esteem I had
felt in the past. God, Inc., Change Winds, Wonderland Gambit, etc.
came and were no improvement. What was worse, he kept going back to
his better, earlier series, like Dancing Gods and Well of Souls,
especially, and trashing them up, too. Over all, he had good ideas
(though fewer as time went on), but he didn't seem to know what his
best ideas were. Too often, he underdeveloped things that were
riveting and emphasized the weakest ideas instead. His greatest
flaws, though, were his love of grotesqueness (it seemed to be a
sexual thing with him) and his heavy-handed PC (he believed that
the American system would fail, but the Soviet system would go on.
Amusingly, in his own mind he was a "militant centrist."). My
favorite series of his was "The Four Lords of the Diamond," and my
favorite novel was "The Identity Matrix." Both of these deserved
sequels, but he didn't write any. In a way, Chalker was a little
like H.G. Wells; his early books were the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add a New Message to This Thread
Posting Guidelines
Primary
- ANY POST(s) MAY BE REMOVED at the discretion of moderators
for violation of this website's guidelines/rules or any law
applicable to this website.
- All discussions must be transformation related OR of interest to
the transformation community.
- Please try to keep posts appropriate for younger teenage eyes to
view (Things you'd be comfortable sharing with a 13 year-old).
- Do not 'attack' other posters. You may attack an individual's
comments but not the individual.
- Be polite, courteous, and respectful. Please keep the conversations
civil.
- While use of an online alias is ok. Do NOT pretend to be another
(or registered) user.
Intellectual Property
- Do not post direct links to complete copyrighted works. Links
provided by (or approved by) the copyright holder may
be exempt.
- Links to content hosted on websites that have a clear, and easy to
find, process for dealing with infringement(s); and a known
reputation for following through with said process, may
be allowed.
- Please read this site's views on copyrighted content on the FAQ
page.
- Do not plagiarize. Credit your sources.
Helpful
- For posts and material that are not safe for viewing in a workplace
or with younger eyes, please mark the thread or post as either, "MATURE CONTENT", "ADULT CONTENT",
or "NSFW".
- Please post clear SPOILER warnings if you intend to give away
details that would spoil the story for those who have not yet seen
the material, preferably by using the spoiler
tags (don't forget to close the spoiler text with the end tag),
like so: <spoiler>Text to be "hidden"
</spoiler>
-- For additional help, please see: HOW TO: Use Spoiler tags
message thread.
- When starting a New Message Thread, please include details about
your topic of discussion or request in the Subject
field to help draw in readers who are interested and avoid wasting
the time of those who are not. Also helpful in searching for the
topic/thread later.
- If you post a link, please provide some detail as to what it is.
Identify the material if possible.
- Please post in English, or include an English translation, when
possible.
- If seeking material / information, include the results of your own
efforts so that others can offer better help (and avoid wasting
time and effort on redundant searches).
- When starting a new thread to request material or information,
please begin the subject with "REQ:"
or "REQUEST".
Etiquette
- Do not post messages in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
- Do not attack a user for improper spelling and/or grammar. Not all
of our community uses English as their native language.
- Please do not stray (far) from the topic of the original post.
- If a poster provides their contact information for any reason, do
NOT clutter the Message Board by asking them to contact you. They
gave out their contact information for a reason.
- No begging. Ask nicely.
- Do not feed the trolls and spammers. Please ignore them.
- Do not keep asking for clips after others have already posted
information on where to obtain the material.
- Please have some patience. Not everyone visits the board daily.
Your post may not be seen (by someone with the correct information
or idea) for several days or weeks.
- No bumping. Bumping will be treated as intentional spamming.
Advertising
- Do not post advertisements.
- One exception is for products or services that relate to entries on
this site. And even then, only post an announcement once. You
should add links or content to the appropriate database entries. Do
not repeat this information to the message board. Doing so will be
considered spamming.
Miscellaneous
- This list is neither all-inclusive or all-exclusive in nature, and
is meant to guide everyone on appropriate content for and conduct
on this Message Board.
- The purpose of this Message Board is to share information about
transformation-related content, news, ideas, etc. Also acceptable,
are conversations that are of interest to the transformation
community.
- Moderation of posts for reasons not listed above are at the
discretion of the Trusted Users who moderate this website, for the
purpose of keeping things within the "spirit" of the owner's wishes
and the website's purpose.
- If you disagree with a moderation decision, please make an argument
as to why it should be reinstated. Use the posting guidelines to justify your point.
Do not attack the moderator.
[Edit this Page] | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|